Job · indexed from ReliefWeb Jobs RSS
International Union for Conservation of Nature
Country: South AfricaOrganization: International Union for Conservation of NatureClosing date: 11 Aug 2026Request for Proposals (RfP)Short-term Consultancy- To conduct the third Independent Review of the Implementation of the Biodiversity Offset Agreement by Black Mountain Mining Pty (Ltd)South Africa , Project, Programme or other requisitioning unitRfP Reference: IUCN-2026-01-01Welcome to this Procurement by IUCN. You are hereby invited to submit a Proposal. Please read the information and instructions carefully because non compliance with the instructions may result in disqualification of your Proposal from this Procurement.1. REQUIREMENTS2. CONTACT DETAILS3. PROCUREMENT TIMETABLEDATE - ACTIVITY4. COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING A PROPOSALIMPORTANT: Submitted documents must be password-protected so that they cannot be opened and read before the submission deadline. Please use the same password for all submitted documents. After the deadline has passed and within 12 hours, please send the password to the IUCN Contact. This will ensure a secure bid submission and opening process.4.3. Pre-Qualification Criteria4.4. Technical ProposalCriterion Description - Information to provide Relative - weight1 Proposed methodology to conduct review Soundness, clarity and feasibility of the proposed methodology to undertake the BO review - 452 General Expertise and Skills (Biodiversity Offsets & Mining Context)Technical expertise and experience relevant to biodiversity offsets and mining-related biodiversity impacts - 303 General Expertise and skills with environmental compliance and implementation Legal, compliance and audit-related expertise relevant to BO implementation and enforcement - 104 National/Local content Contribution to national and local economic participation and transformation objectives - 105 Knowledge of the South African context, policy and legal framework for BOA and protected areas Understanding of South Africa’s regulatory, institutional and policy environment for biodiversity offsets and protected areas - 54.5. Financial Proposal4.5.2. Prices include all costs4.5.3. Applicable Goods and Services Taxes4.5.4. Currency of proposed rates and prices4.5.5. Breakdown of rates and prices4.8. Withdrawals and Changes5. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS5.1. Completeness5.2. Pre-Qualification Criteria5.3. Technical Evaluation5.3.1. Scoring Method5.3.2. Minimum Quality Thresholds5.3.3. Technical Score5.4. Financial Evaluation and Financial Scores5.5. Total ScoreThus, for example, if your technical score is 83% and your financial score is 77%, you will receive a total score of 83 * 70% + 77 * 30% = 58.1% + 23.1% = 81.2%.6. EXPLANATION OF PROCUREMENT PROCEDURE7. CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN THIS PROCUREMENT8. CONFIDENTIALITY AND DATA PROTECTION9. COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE10. CONTRACT11. ABOUT IUCNwww.iucn.orghttps://twitter.com/IUCN/12. ATTACHMENTSTerms of ReferenceTitle: To conduct the third Independent Review of the Implementation of the Biodiversity Offset Agreement by Black Mountain Mining Pty (Ltd)Objective of the ConsultancyThe purpose of this request for proposal (RFP) is to appoint an independent auditor to conduct the third independent review of the implementation of the biodiversity offset contemplated in the biodiversity offset (Offset) agreement (BOA) entered into between Black Mountain Mining Pty (Ltd) (BMM) and the erstwhile Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation, now known as the Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs, Rural Development and Land Reform (DAERL) on 16 October 2014.BackgroundProject Reference: P03719About the IUCNThe International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is a membership union uniquely composed of both government and civil society organisations. It provides public, private and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) with the knowledge and tools that enable human progress, economic development and nature conservation to take place together.Created in 1948, the IUCN is now the world’s largest and most diverse environmental network, harnessing the knowledge, resources and reach of more than 1,400 member organisations and around 15,000 experts. It is a leading provider of conservation data, assessments and analysis. Its broad membership enables the IUCN to fill the role of incubator and trusted repository of best practices, tools and international standards.The IUCN provides a neutral space in which diverse stakeholders including governments, NGOs, scientists, businesses, local communities, indigenous peoples’ organisations and others can work together to forge and implement solutions to environmental challenges and achieve sustainable development.Working with many partners and supporters, the IUCN implements a large and diverse portfolio of conservation projects worldwide. Combining the latest science with the traditional knowledge of local communities, these projects work to reverse habitat loss, restore ecosystems and improve people’s well-being.www.iucn.orghttps://twitter.com/IUCN/About the ProjectBMM received an environmental authorization for its Gamsberg Mining Project (Gamsberg) in terms of section 24 of the National Environmental Management Act, 107 of 1998, as amended, from the then Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation, now known as DAERL, on 13 August 2013, with reference numbers: NC/BA/NAM/KHA/AGG/2012 and NCP/EIA/0000155/2012 (Gamsberg EA). The Gamsberg EA was subsequently amended on 1 December 2014 and 2 December 2014.Conditions 50 to 60 of the Gamsberg EA sets out the special biodiversity offset conditions, which required BMM to, among other things, secure in perpetuity, through one or more of the mechanisms provided for in section 20 or 23 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, 57 of 2003, as amended (NEMPAA), areas and/or portions of properties which individually or collectively comprise at the least the following areas of sustainably intact habitat that house the following vegetation types:3 700ha of land comprising Aggeneys Gravel Vygieveld, including those component habitats supporting quartz gravel communities and those that are range restricted or which support localised and endemic plant species;2 200ha of Bushmanland Inselberg Shrubland, including those habitat units supporting large succulent plants on the south facing aspects;4 000ha of Bushmanland Arid Grassland, including those component habitats supporting calcrete gravel communities; and2 000ha of Azonal vegetation types compromising Bushmanland ephemeral river courses and outwash plains.Condition 57 of the Gamsberg EA also required BMM to enter into a legal agreement with the DAERL in order to regulate the manner in which the Offset obligations are discharged and managed. The BOA was accordingly entered into between DAERL and BMM on 16 October 2014.It is a requirement under the Gamsberg EA, and under clause 14.7 of the BOA, for an independent review (IR) of the implementation of the BOA to be undertaken by an independent auditor or team of independent auditors every five years, with the first review to be undertaken upon the expiry of the five year period - calculated from the date of signature of the BOA, being 16 October 2014.The first IR was conducted over the period of September to November 2019 by an independent auditor. The draft report prepared by the independent auditor following the initial IR (published in November 2019) (Draft Report), highlighted substantial implementation challenges as well as differences between BMM and DAERL (collectively, the Parties) regarding the interpretation of the BOA.In this context, the Parties, under the guidance of the steering committee established in terms of clause 12 of the BOA (SC), required further assistance from the independent auditor to assist the Parties in better understanding the compliance related findings, the implementation challenges, as well as the interpretational difficulties that were identified in the Draft Report. The Parties also required the independent auditor to undertake a follow up/closing review which was completed in May 2020. The first and follow up review, are both regarded by the Parties as the “First Review”. A copy of the First Review report will be provided to the independent auditor upon appointment.The Parties further agreed for the second review to be conducted in 2022 (Second Review), two years earlier than required in terms of the BOA, as per the recommendations of the First Independent Review. The Second Review occurred between October 2022 and February 2023. The final report in respect of the Second Review was published in February 2023. Several recommendations to the SC were made in the Second Review in respect of, inter alia,improving and/or enhancing the implementation of the Offset.In the second review, one of the recommendations called to consider conducting an independent review in 2024 once the Second Time Period has lapsed. That Second Time Period was further extended of a year (to 1 March 2025) and it was therefore decided by the parties to have the third independent review after the 1 March 2025 deadline.The purpose of this RFP is to appoint a suitable qualified independent auditor or team of auditors to conduct the third independent review of the BOA.Description of the AssignmentThe requirements of the review are prescribed by clauses 14.7 to 14.10 of the BOA. The purpose of the review is set out in clause 14.8 of the BOA, which is to:clause 14.8.1: determine compliance with the provisions of the BOA by the Parties (being, BMM and DEARL). In this regard, we note that the independent reviewer must focus in particular on the provisions of those clauses in respect of which the Parties were found to be partially compliant and/or non-compliant in the Second Review, and on those clauses which the Parties were not assessed against during the Second Review. The independent auditor is also expected to determine whether the recommendations made in the Second Review report have been implemented by the relevant Party/ies;clause 14.8.2: determine the adequacy of the implementation of the Offset in terms of the BOA; andclause 14.8.3: provide recommendations to the SC on, inter alia, improving and/or enhancing the implementation of the Offset, including recommendations to adjust the financial provisions in terms of clause 10 of the BOA, where required.It is also required of the reviewer to provide initial suggestions and insights on the following points during the review process:The readiness of the Parties to undertake the verification of completion of the Offset in terms of clauses 14.3 to 14.6 of the BOA, as well as the actions still to be taken to achieve completion of the Offset (and what is meant by completion of the biodiversity offset?)Recommended measures to be implemented by the Parties to ensure the financial sustainability of the Gamsberg Nature Reserve beyond BMM’s financial contributions under this BOAThe adequacy of the current suretyship provided by BMM (Was there a resolution of the directors/Board of the company providing the suretyship? Is there a quantification of the financial value of the suretyship? Should it be reflected as a conditional liability in the audited financial statements of the company providing the suretyship?)The actual duration of the financial provisions to be made by BMM in terms of BOAWhat are the rehabilitation responsibilities of BMM in terms of BOA and what should be understood by rehabilitation in the context of the BOA? andGuidance managing the respective governance requirements of the BOA, the Integrated Management Plan of the nature reserve, and the Gamsberg Nature Reserve Trust, to ensure effective, efficient, and integrated management of the Gamsberg nature reserve while avoiding duplication of governance structures.The following documents are annexed to this RFP:the Gamsberg EA;the BOA;the draft First Review report, dated November 2019;the First Review follow-up report, May 2020;the Second Review report, dated 20 February 2023;Proposals should be divided into two parts, technical and financial, two separate documents.The technical proposal should at least address the following points:Proposed methodology and approach for undertaking the independent review, including quality assurance measures;Proposed work plan, timelines and project implementation schedule;Relevant organisational and/or individual experience in undertaking similar assignments;Demonstrated expertise in one or more of the following areas: Biodiversity offsets and the mitigation hierarchy; Biodiversity conservation and ecological restoration; Environmental compliance, auditing and implementation; Environmental governance and protected area management; Environmental law, regulatory compliance and contract law; Financial assurance mechanisms for environmental obligations; Mining, infrastructure or other large-scale development projects; Implementation of No Net Loss, Net Gain or related biodiversity performance standards; (Relevant experience in conducting independent reviews, compliance audits, evaluations, due diligence assessments or performance reviews of environmental programmes, biodiversity initiatives, environmental authorisations, protected areas, mining operations or other natural resource management projects. Experience with biodiversity offsets, ecological compensation mechanisms or similar environmental performance frameworks will be considered an advantage)Demonstrated knowledge of the South African environmental legislative and policy framework, including biodiversity offsets and protected areas, or the ability to access such expertise through the proposed team;Composition of the proposed review team, clearly identifying the role, qualifications and relevant experience of each team member, together with their CVs;A declaration confirming the absence of any actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest.The financial proposal should contain a detailed costing to undertake the review and an overview/summary page with the following information:Professional fees;Overview of hourly/daily rates by team member/skill set;Total number of days (hours) per team member;Total professional fees;Estimated travel and accommodation costs for the site visit (to be shown separately);Costs for bi-weekly meetings with IUCN (15–30 minutes, as required);Management costs (if applicable); andGrand total (professional fees plus estimated reimbursable travel costs).The proposal should also contain a statement regarding any conflict of interest, in which the auditor should state any potential direct or indirect conflict of interest. The independent auditor should specifically outline the specific services he/she has provided to DAERL, Vedanta Zinc International or BMM regarding the development and/or implementation of the BOA and highlight any risk of conflict of interest in this context.Duration of the IRThe IR will take place over a period of 4 months, commencing in September 2026 and concluding in December 2026.Deliverables and ActivitiesThe independent auditor will provide the following deliverables and carry out the following activities as part of the IR:Deliverable/Activity - Description - DeadlineInception report and project meeting - A detailed inception report outlining the independent auditor's understanding of the scope of the IR, the proposed methodology, work plan, timelines, proposed outline of report, review matrix and any logistical or data requirements. Presentation of key elements during inception meeting (2 hours), including clarification of any questions – followed by submission of final work plan and schedule - 1 week – expected start date 1 September 2026Review process - Initial meeting with Parties and IUCNReview of documentation submitted by PartiesInterviews with Parties (face to face or online)Site visit with IUCN and parties (2/3 days)Submission of clarification to Parties in writingParties submit clarification informationPossibility for further online clarification meetingsRegular online project management meetings with IUCN – every two weeks or when necessary for planning purposeDraft IR Report for comment - The IR report (draft and final) will be aligned with the format, content, style and approach used in the previous review processes and reports (please consult them), to ensure consistency. The report will at least include the following:Executive summary;Acronyms, abbreviations; definitions;Introduction and project background;Scope of work and objectives;Report limitations and assumptions;Methodology and approach;Document review;Independent review framework;Findings and observations;Discussion; andRecommendations.The IR (draft and final) report must also include a compliance summary table in respect of the Parties' compliance with their obligations in terms of the BOA, an assessment and rationale for compliance categorization, including at least the information:a clause description;compliance assessment (Compliance, Non-Compliance, Compliant but Late, Partially Compliant, Non Applicable, Non Compliance Obligations); andbrief rationale for compliance assessment.(Please consult previous reports to see previous summary tables).The IR report (draft and final) must summarize each finding, rating and recommendation from the third IR, with supporting evidence.The IR report (draft and final) will also include an assessment of the financial provisions, adequacy and compliance with financial requirements under clause 10 of the BOA, including recommendations to adjust the financial provisions in terms of clause 10 of the BOA, where required.The IR report (draft and final) will also include the independent auditor's views on the following matters during the review process:The readiness of the Parties to undertake the verification of completion of the Offset in terms of clauses 14.3 to 14.6 of the BOA, as well as the actions still to be taken to achieve completion of the Offset (and what is meant by completion of the biodiversity offset?)Recommended measures to be implemented by the Parties to ensure the financial sustainability of the Gamsberg Nature Reserve beyond BMM’s financial contributions under this BOAThe adequacy of the current suretyship provided by BMM (Was there a resolution of the directors/Board of the company providing the suretyship? Is there a quantification of the financial value of the suretyship? Should it be reflected as a conditional liability in the audited financial statements of the company providing the suretyship?)The actual duration of the financial provisions to be made by BMM in terms of BOAWhat are the rehabilitation responsibilities of BMM in terms of BOA and what should be understood by rehabilitation in the context of the BOA? andGuidance managing the respective governance requirements of the BOA, the Integrated Management Plan of the nature reserve, and the Gamsberg Nature Reserve Trust, to ensure effective, efficient, and integrated management of the Gamsberg nature reserve while avoiding duplication of governance structures.The executive summary should also be presented as a separate document that could be published on the website of both parties. The executive summary should also be translated in Afrikaans.Clarification meeting with Parties and IUCN – 4 hoursParties will submit to the reviewer their comments on draft report in writing, and this will be followed by a meeting with IUCN, parties and auditors to finalise any queries on the draft report. - 4 weeks from starting datePayment ScheduleThe table below summarises the chronological order of deliverables and indicates milestones at which the IUCN will pay the independent auditor.Deliverable - Milestone paymentDeliverable1 -Draft Review Report 1 - 20%Deliverable 1 and 2- Draft Review Report - 30%Deliverable 3-4 Final report and presentation to SC and approved - 50%Skills and ExperienceThe independent auditor must have the following skills, education and experience as a minimum:The Lead Auditor should possess an advanced degree (master’s or higher) in environmental science, ecology, conservation biology, biodiversity management, environmental law, natural resource management, environmental governance, sustainable development, auditing, or another relevant discipline. Additional expertise within the proposed team may complement the required competencies;Demonstrated experience in biodiversity offsets, ecological compensation, environmental compliance, conservation planning, protected area management, restoration, natural resource governance, or similar environmental programmes. Experience in the mining or extractive sector would be an advantage but is not mandatory.Experience conducting independent reviews, audits, evaluations, compliance assessments, environmental assurance reviews, or similar assignments involving environmental agreements, conservation programmes or regulatory compliance.Any previous experience with independent review of offset agreement or obligations;Knowledge of the South African context, policy, guidelines and legal framework for biodiversity offsets and protected areas;Excellent analytical, writing, and communication skills are essential, with a proven ability to synthesize complex legal, technical, and financial information into clear, actionable recommendations; andThe independent auditor must be fully independent, with no conflict of interest with regards either Party to the BOA, to ensure an objective, unbiased review process.Supervision and coordinationThe independent auditor will report to and work under the supervision of Vhalinavho Khavhagali, Country Representative, South Africa IUCN.It is planned that the review process will start on 1 September 2026 and that the final audit report will be released on 1 December 2026, including draft audit report by 15 April 2026.The review process will include the following stages:Inception project meeting with IUCN – 2 hoursSubmission of final workplan and schedule from reviewerIntroduction meeting with parties, IUCN and reviewer – 1 hourReview of the synthesis report and supporting documents and supporting documentation as submitted by the partiesSite visit with IUCN and partiesWritten submission of clarification questions to parties after perusal of documentationWritten response by parties to questionsClarification online workshopRegular online update meetings with IUCN as required by auditor but at least every two weeks, 30minDraft review report submitted for commentsWritten response (including clarification points and questions) to draft report from partiesVirtual Engagement workshop, IUCN, Parties and reviewer, to finalise reportFinal report submittedThe compliance ratings used should be the same as those used in the first and second review as outlined in the table below.Compliant (C)All actions outlined in the clause were completed and where a specific timeframe was stipulated in the BOA activities were completed within the required timeframe. A clause was only assessed as compliant if the IP were fully compliant with the clauseCompleted but Late (C-L)The objective of the clause was achieved and all necessary activities were completed. No further actions were required. However, the IP did not complete the required actions within the timeframe specified by the BOA. *Note: This category was added after the Initial IA Report was completedPartially Compliant (P-C)Some of the activities in the clause had been completed but not all and further actions were required to achieve compliance. The IP were assessed as P-C with a clause if more than 50% of the requirements had been met and these were tangible. Since large areas of sensitive habitat had been secured clauses 6.3.1 to 6.3.4 were assessed as P-C. Where the IP had taken considerable steps to progress compliance this was noted in the reportNot Compliant (N-C)Where the parties had made some progress in the right direction but there was still nothing tangible i.e. although the correct paperwork existed for fencing, no fencing had taken place on the ground yet so this was assessed as N-C. Where part of any clause was non-compliant the IR generally assessed the whole clause as not compliantNot Assessed (N-A)Where there was no implementation obligation to either IP and/or information was missing preventing the clause from being assessed i.e. the MP could not be assessed since it had not yet been developed at the time of the Initial IA; or if a time frame had not yet been reached and therefore the clause could not yet be assessed.No Compliance Obligation (NCO)Where clauses did not have compliance obligations;The structure and format of the report should also be aligned with the previous independent review reports.It should be noted that the procurement process is undertaken by IUCN on behalf of the SC, comprised of BMM and DAERL representatives. The IUCN will be the project manager for the review process, and therefore, the service provider (independent auditor) will report directly to the IUCN during this process. The IUCN will oversee the entire process and will be copied on all communication related to the review from or to the service provider (independent auditor).The service provider (independent reviewer) should schedule and include in its costing proposal at least one site visit to Gamsberg.Documents used to conduct the IR will be centralised by IUCN and provided to the selected auditor, once appointed, under a strict confidentiality agreement. Requests for additional documents will be channelled through IUCN. Interviews with representatives of the Parties, if needed, will be scheduled early in the audit process, in collaboration with IUCN. Such interviews can be done virtually. Representatives from the parties are in Johannesburg, Gamsberg (Aggeneys in the Northern Cape Province) and Kimberley.Declaration of Undertaking In relation to Consultancy Services Conduct the third Independent Review of the Implementation of the Biodiversity Offset Agreement by Black Mountain Mining Pty (Ltd)I, the undersigned, hereby confirm that I am an authorised representative of the following organisation:Registered Name of Organisation (the “Organisation”): _______________________Registered Address (incl. country): _______________________________________Year of Registration:__________________________________________________I hereby authorise IUCN to store and use the information included in the attached Proposal for the purpose of evaluating Proposals and selecting the Proposal IUCN deems the most favourable. I acknowledge that IUCN is required to retain the Proposal in its entirety for 10 years after then end of the resulting contract and make this available to internal and external auditors and donors as and when reasonably requested.Where the Proposal includes Personal Data as defined by the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), I confirm that the Organisation has been authorised by each Data Subject to share this Data with IUCN for the purposes stated above.I further confirm that the following statements are correct:The Organisation is duly registered in accordance with all applicable laws.The Organisation is fully compliant with all its tax and social security obligations.The Organisation and its staff and representatives are free of any real or perceived conflicts of interest with regards to IUCN and its Mission.The Organisation agrees to declare to IUCN any real or perceived emerging conflicts of interests it or any of its staff and representatives may have concerning IUCN. The Organisation acknowledges that IUCN may terminate any contracts with the Organisation that would, in IUCN sole discretion, be negatively affected by such conflicts of interests.None of the Organisation’s staff has ever been convicted of grave professional misconduct or any other offence concerning their professional conduct.Neither the Organisation nor any of its staff and representatives have ever been convicted of fraud, corruption, money laundering, supporting terrorism or involvement in a criminal organisation.The Organisation acknowledges that engagement by itself or any of its staff in fraud, corruption, money laundering, supporting terrorism or involvement in a criminal organisation will entitle IUCN to terminate any and all contracts with the Organisation with immediate effect.The Organisation is a going concern and is not bankrupt or being wound up, is not having its affairs administered by the courts, has not suspended business activities, is not the subject of proceedings concerning those matters, or in any analogous situation arising from a similar procedure provided for in national legislation or regulations.The Organisation complies with all applicable environmental regulatory requirements or other legal requirements relating to sustainability and environmental protection.The Organisation is not included in the UN Security Council Sanctions List, EU Sanctions Map, US Office of Foreign Assets Control Sanctions List, or the World Bank listing of ineligible firms and individuals. The Organisation agrees that it will not provide direct or indirect support to firms and individuals included in these lists.The Organisation has not been, is not, and will not be involved or implicated in any violations of Indigenous Peoples’ rights, or injustice or abuse of human rights related to other groups or individuals, including forced evictions, violation of fundamental rights of workers as defined by the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on the Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, child labour, sexual exploitation, sexual abuse, or sexual harassment.______________________________________________________< Name and position of authorised representative of the Proposer >Declaration of Undertaking In relation to Consultancy Services Conduct the third Independent Review of the Implementation of the Biodiversity Offset Agreement by Black Mountain Mining Pty (Ltd)I, the undersigned, hereby confirm that I am self-employed and able to provide the service independent of any organisation or other legal entity.Full name (as in passport):Home or Office (please delete as appropriate) Address (incl. country):I hereby authorise IUCN to store and use the information included in the attached Proposal for the purpose of evaluating Proposals and selecting the Proposal IUCN deems the most favourable, including Personal Data as defined by the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). I acknowledge that IUCN is required to retain my Proposal in its entirety for 10 years after then end of the resulting contract and make this available to internal and external auditors and donors as and when reasonably requested.I further confirm that the following statements are correct:I am legally registered as self-employed in accordance with all applicable laws.I am fully compliant with all my tax and social security obligations.I am free of any real or perceived conflicts of interest with regards to IUCN and its Mission.I agree to declare to IUCN any real or perceived emerging conflicts of interests I may have concerning IUCN. I acknowledge that IUCN may terminate any contracts with me that would, in IUCN sole discretion, be negatively affected by such conflicts of interests.I have never been convicted of grave professional misconduct or any other offence concerning my professional conduct.I have never been convicted of fraud, corruption, money laundering, supporting terrorism or involvement in a criminal organisation.I acknowledge that engagement in fraud, corruption, money laundering, supporting terrorism or involvement in a criminal organisation will entitle IUCN to terminate any and all contracts with me with immediate effect.I am not included in the UN Security Council Sanctions List, EU Sanctions Map, US Office of Foreign Assets Control Sanctions List, or the World Bank listing of ineligible firms and individuals. I agree that I will not provide direct or indirect support to firms and individuals included in these lists.I have not been, am not, and will not be involved or implicated in any violations of Indigenous Peoples’ rights, or injustice or abuse of human rights related to other groups or individuals, including forced evictions, violation of fundamental rights of workers as defined by the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on the Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, child labour, sexual exploitation, sexual abuse, or sexual harassment.How to applyPlease use the link below to apply:https://procurement.iucn.org
Provenance
| Field | How we know | State | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publication date | Official API or feed | Data quality: Source-backed | 100 |
States describe GLODA's confidence in its own fields, never a judgement on the notice or its parties.
The notice above is the public record. Signing in adds the analysis: saved views and alerts on searches like this one, workflow and pipeline, exports and full workspace tooling.
GLODA indexes publicly available notices from the funders and organizations it covers. We are an independent platform and are not affiliated with, or endorsed by, any indexed organization.
© 2026 Global Development Alliance LLC. All rights reserved.