Mid-Term Evaluation, Sundarbans, India

Country: India Organization: Sign of Hope Closing date: 19 Nov 2026 Organisation Hoffnungszeichen | Sign of Hope e.V. www.hoffnungszeichen.de, www.sign-of-hope.org Position Mid-term Evaluation Consultant Type of Contract Short-term consultancy Location Home-based with field mission travel to West-Bengal (Sundarbans), India Relevant Languages English, Bengali Application Deadline 19th November 2026 Starting Date 1st December 2026 Project Title Adapting to Climate Change and increasing the Resilience of particularly vulnerable and marginalised families on the Sundarban Islands Total Project Budget 1.066.666 EURO Hoffnungszeichen | Sign of Hope e.V. (SoH) is announcing an open tender procedure for consultancy services for a mid-term evaluation in India. Background and Rationale Hoffnungszeichen | Sign of Hope e.V. (SoH) is a Christian motivated organisation for Human Rights, Humanitarian Assistance and Development Cooperation. From its base in Constance, Germany, SoH is committed to helping those in distress and exploited people worldwide. This mid-term evaluation is commissioned under the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) budget for development projects run by private organisations. SoH is the private German executing agency and the contracting party, with Development Research Communication and Services Centre (DRCSC)being the local implementing partner. The project contributes to the conservation of natural resources and strengthens coastal communities of the Sundarbans threatened by the effects of Climate Change through a transition to sustainable, environmentally friendly livelihoods. Improved access to institutionalised forms of organisation, alternative income generating activities, investment capital, and government support will strengthen the self-help capacities of the target group. They learn sustainable and climate- resilient practises in agriculture and aquaculture (home and school gardens, integrated agriculture, livestock and fish farming). Reforestation as well as biodiversity and coastal protection increase the target region's resilience to climate disasters. The target group and representatives of institutions and the civil society are sensitised to the negative effects of Climate Change and gain access to information on Climate Change, environmental protection and biodiversity. Purpose, Objectives and Use The purpose of the evaluation is to provide SoH and DRCSC with a comprehensive assessment of the project, conducted systematically and impartially, as well as analyse the progress towards the achievement of the project’s results and identify risks to sustainability. The study will provide concrete, credible and practical recommendations that will assist with the timely incorporation of the findings into the decision-making process and contribute to the organisational learning of both implementing organisations. The study will support the project quality assurance measures implemented by SoH and meet the donor requirements towards the development projects implemented by German private organisations. The evaluation will address evaluation questions based on the standard OECD/DAC evaluation criteria of relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, and impact (please see http://www.oecd.org/development/evaluation/daccriteriaforevaluatingdevelopmentassistance.htm). The objectives of the evaluations are to: • Assess the extent to which the project has sustainably achieved its objectives and results (see annexe 1), including the extent to which the lives of the project beneficiaries have been improved, • Identify the strengths and weaknesses in terms of planning, management, implementation and monitoring of the project, • Evaluate sustainability measures, • Identify cross-cutting issues addressed through the project, including gender equality, human rights, marginalised groups, inclusion, and other issues, • Identify risks and weaknesses and make recommendations for the successful completion of the project. • An explanation of how Target Group Category 1 exerts a guiding and strategic influence on Target Group Category 2 and passes on its knowledge to them. • Development of a sustainability strategy with an exit plan. Duties and Responsibilities The Evaluation Consultant will work in close cooperation with the responsible SoH Officer and the local implementing partner. The duties and responsibilities of the Evaluation Consultant will include: • Develop a work plan outlining the proposed research methodology, geographical coverage and schedule to conduct the study, • Conduct a desk review of relevant documents, • Carry out a project site visit to a project location to conduct research, collect data and establish contact with the local implementing partner, project beneficiaries and relevant project stakeholders, • Review and evaluate available data and existing sources of information, including the project proposal, annual reports, conducted studies and other documents, • Examine institutional, technical, staffing and financial capacities of the implementing partner as well as its relationship with the target group and other relevant stakeholders. Expected Deliverables The study will produce the following deliverables: • an inception report, including the proposed research methodology and data collection tools, a table of content and timeline of research activities prior to the site visit to the project location, • a comprehensive report of a maximum of 30 pages with practical recommendations and relevant annexes (including raw data and documented records). A template will be provided to serve as a guide and may be used to structure the final report. Study Quality and Ethical Standards The study team will take all reasonable steps to ensure that the study is designed and conducted to respect and protect the rights and welfare of the people and communities involved. Furthermore, the study should be aligned to the following standards and applicable practices: • Utility: the study must be useful and used. • Feasibility: the study must be realistic, diplomatic and managed in a sensible, cost-effective manner. • Ethics and Legality: the study must be conducted in an ethical and legal manner, with particular regard for the welfare of those involved in and affected by the Study. • Impartiality and Independence: the study should be impartial, providing a comprehensive and unbiased assessment that takes into account the views of all stakeholders. • Transparency: the study activities should reflect an attitude of openness and transparency. • Accuracy: the study should be technically accurate and credible, providing sufficient information about the data collection, analysis, and interpretation methods so that its worth or merit can be determined. • Participation: the Stakeholders should be consulted and meaningfully involved in the study process when feasible and appropriate. • Collaboration: Collaboration between key operating partners in the study process improves the legitimacy and utility of the study. The study must be in line with the SoH guiding principles and Code of Conduct. Process/Timeframe The total duration of the assignment is up to 20 working days within the period from 1st December 2026 to 30th December 2026. Planning meeting with DRCSC, handover of relevant documents 1 day Initial document review and inception report preparation 4 days Sharing inception report with SoH and DRCSC 1 day Finalisation of inception report 1 day Data collection site visit to a project location 5 days Data analysis, draft report with annexes 5 days Incorporating received feedback and report finalisation 3 days Qualifications and Experience Essential: • Minimum of 5 years of project evaluation and/or implementation experience in the result-based management framework • Proven experience of conducting feasibility studies, evaluations and other research projects • Technical and methodological knowledge to conduct research projects and formulate conclusions based on a solid methodology, assessing projects for relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of projects • Experience working with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and partnered projects • Fluency in written and spoken English Desirable: • Experience in the relevant field/sector • Professional familiarity with the project country/region • Practical experience of working for and/or evaluating BMZ-funded projects • Fluency in written and spoken Bengali Academic Background An advanced level university degree (Masters’ degree or equivalent) in social sciences, public administration, international development studies, law and/or other relevant field. A first-level university degree in combination with additional years of qualifying experience may be accepted. The Evaluation Consultant is to be independent and impartial with no liabilities to any other organisation or government entity regarding this evaluation. How to apply Application Process Please submit the following documents as PDF files (documents in other formats will not be accepted) with the subject line “Mid-Term Evaluation in West Bengal (Sundarbans), India, DC-IND25.01” to procurement@sign-of-hope.orgno later than 19th November, 2026; 23:59 CET: • A resumé indicating all relevant experience (max. 2 pages), • contacts of at least two professional referees, • a cover letter, including a brief description of the proposed research methodology (technical proposal max. 2 - 3 pages) and a comprehensive breakdown of costs (financial proposal), including professional fees and all other relevant costs, including travel expenses, • a writing sample of the document of similar research value (e.g. a feasibility study, an evaluation report). Companies as well as independent consultants are invited for this tender. Female and differently abled candidates are strongly encouraged to apply. Please note that due to a large number of applications we may limit establishing contact to shortlisted applicants. Bids received after deadline will not be considered. If offers are incomplete, bidders may be able to hand in missing documents within a deadline upon request by SoH. The selection of the consultant will be conducted jointly by DRCSC and SoH. Interviews with shortlisted candidates will be held online. The consultancy agreement will be set up by SoH and DRCSC. Consultancy agreements set up by consultants won’t be accepted. Criteria and weighting for the evaluation of the submitted proposals: • Essential and desirable competencies, proposed methodology: 22 % • Financial proposal (fee): 30 % • Performance during interview: 35 % • Writing samples: 7 % • Minimum amount of years of relevant experience: 3 % • Language skills: 3 % Annexe 1: Impact Matrix: https://hzsoh.de:8023/index.php/s/TCJTcGKNoGkA2CR